The Taoiseach has defended the Government’s response to tackling emissions after a new report warned that Ireland could face potential costs of 27 billion euro if it fails to reach its targets.
Micheal Martin said Ireland has made “very significant progress” on climate issues in the last four years, adding that the Government is “determined” to continue its “progress”.
Mr Martin said the next big push will be offshore renewables.
The alarming figure of 27 billion euro comes under a worst-case projection under which Ireland does not implement any further measures to reduce emissions and the price of purchasing credits from other EU member states.
We need your consent to load this Social Media content. We use a number of different Social Media outlets to manage extra content that can set cookies on your device and collect data about your activity.
On the other hand, the Government could reduce this risk and potential costs to between three and 12 billion euro if it follows through on measures from its own plans that have yet to be enacted.
Ireland is bound by targets for renewable energy consumption and reductions in greenhouse gas emissions under multiple EU schemes, which come with significant potential costs for non-compliance.
A joint report by the Fiscal Advisory Council and Climate Change Advisory Council says that Ireland needs to act on the climate targets now to avoid incurring “colossal costs”.
Reacting to the report, which Mr Martin said he has not yet read in its entirety, he said: “The first thing I would say is, Government is spending a lot of money right now on climate, and it’s spending a lot of money on infrastructure.
“For example, that report talks about the (electricity) grid, and we’re spending money on the grid, and we’ve already indicated that the next wave of spending on the grid will be very, very significant. We’ve accelerated plans.
We need your consent to load this Social Media content. We use a number of different Social Media outlets to manage extra content that can set cookies on your device and collect data about your activity.
“We’ve asked EirGrid to come back to Government in respect of accelerating plans in terms of enhancement and expansion of the grid, in the context of Storm Eowyn.
“There has been a lot of capital expenditure on the grid. There will be more capital expenditure on the grid.
“The Government has to bring people with it in terms of the journey. But we’re well below 1990 levels in terms of emissions, and that’s notwithstanding the fact that our population has increased nearly by one and a half million.
“Our economy has been growing. Emissions have come down last year. There are positive signs this year as well in respect of emissions. So there’s a positive side of what Ireland has been doing quickly on onshore renewables, which probably has been one of the more successful countries in Europe, on onshore renewables.
“The next big push would be offshore. But there are planning mechanisms which we can’t abolish, and there are issues there, but we are moving on it, and we’re on target in terms of 2030 in respect of offshore renewable.
“I think the last four years represented very significant progress on climate, and we are determined as a Government to continue that progress. There’s a huge range in what that report concludes, and the authors themselves confirm that there’s a lot of uncertainty about it.”
Most countries in the EU are off track to meet reduction targets under the Effort Sharing Regulation (ESR), but Ireland is among the worst-performing countries for exceeding its targets of million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent (Mt CO2 eq).
Fiscal Advisory Council chairman Seamus Coffey said costs could be up to 12 billion euro, depending on what measures are taken by the Government (Niall Carson/PA)
On a per head of population basis, Ireland is the worst performing country under the ESR targets, which covers non-aviation domestic transport, buildings, small industry, waste and agriculture emissions.
Marie Donnelly, chairwoman of the Climate Change Advisory Council, described Ireland as a “standout laggard” in this regard.
If Ireland fails to comply with its EU requirements, the scale of the potential bill depends on how close it gets to meeting each of its targets and the price of compliance. The price also depends on broader progress across the EU in achieving the same targets.
The report finds that if the Government follows through on its Climate Action Plan, this would reduce potential costs by more than half.
However, the councils warn that the plan is “not being delivered at the scale or the speed required”.
Asked about the large gap between the lowest and highest cost estimates, Fiscal Advisory Council chairman Seamus Coffey said: “The range is very broad – but it doesn’t include zero, it doesn’t include negative numbers.
“A range that broad that doesn’t get over zero suggests what side of the line we’re going to be on.”
Pressed on where he expected the final bill to be, he said there was still a lot of uncertainty but said it could be between 10 and 12 billion euro, depending on what action the Government takes.
The report presents the Government with a choice between spending now and reaping the benefits of ramping up efforts, or transferring massive amounts to EU neighbours for Ireland’s non-compliance and falling into deepening emissions targets.
We need your consent to load this Social Media content. We use a number of different Social Media outlets to manage extra content that can set cookies on your device and collect data about your activity.
The authors argue that it makes the most sense to spend money now and avoid a “colossal missed opportunity”.
“Recent events have highlighted how climate action can benefit people. Ireland’s reliance on imported fossil fuels left it exposed to geopolitical disruptions and price rises during the cost-of-living crisis.
“More recently, Storm Eowyn showed the need for more secure and stable energy infrastructure.
“Acting now can help reduce these vulnerabilities and avoid large transfers to neighbouring countries. Ultimately, these are funds that could instead be used to improve people’s wellbeing.”
The report states that failure to meet targets has already cost Ireland significant amounts of money. In the past four years, Ireland has lost out on 500 million euro of potential revenue from carbon credits it could have sold but is instead holding on to the bridge the gap to the overall target.
The authors add: “Swifter action would do more than just avoid hefty payments and meet Ireland’s agreed commitments. It would transform Ireland’s society, making it healthier, more sustainable, and more energy secure.”
The prices that will apply under the ESR are highly uncertain and will ultimately depend on the extent to which other EU member states achieve their targets.
The price of “emissions allocations” from countries that have overperformed on their reductions will be agreed by the two states involved. As many countries are due to miss their targets, there will probably be a shortage of allocations to go around, and therefore, market prices are hard to predict.
With a shortage of allocations, some countries could face infringement proceedings, which may be set at the level of the last allocation purchased.
However, Ms Donnelly said “there is hope” and that “a few measures could make a big difference”.
As examples, she said seven billion euro could be spent on upgrading Ireland’s electricity grid, four billion euro could be spent on reducing the price of 700,000 electric cars to below 15,000 euro and ramping up charging infrastructure, one billion euro could be spent on supports for forestry and peatlands.
This amounts to 12 billion euro – one-tenth of the capital spending planned out to 2030.