The attack followed a controversial speech by ousted former PM Sheikh Hasina, Rahman’s daughter, from exile in India, in which she tried to discredit the protest movement that brought her down.
Dhaka, Bangladesh – Six months after a mass uprising toppled former Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, a mob set the house of her late father and the country’s independence hero, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, on fire on Wednesday night.
Along with Rahman’s Dhanmondi 32 residence, protesters also set the homes of exiled leaders of Hasina’s party, the Awami League, on fire.
The mob gathered after Hasina delivered a fiery online speech on Wednesday evening from exile in India, in which she called on her supporters to stand against the interim government led by Nobel laureate, Muhammad Yunus.
The Dhanmondi 32 house was also attacked during the July-August protests against Hasina that culminated in her ousting after 15 years of rule. The protests, led largely by students and young people, began over a controversial government job quota system and transformed into nationwide unrest following a harsh crackdown by authorities, where at least 834 people were killed and 20,000 were injured in clashes with the police.
Who was Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, and what does the Dhanmondi 32 residence signify?
Hasina’s late father, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman – widely known as “Bangabandhu” (Friend of Bengal) and “Mujib” – led the nation’s liberation struggle against Pakistan that led to its independence in 1971.
As the new nation’s first president and later prime minister, Rahman’s leadership shaped the country’s early years. On January 24, 1975, he introduced a controversial one-party state system, known as Bangladesh Krishak Sramik Awami League (BaKSAL), which eliminated political opposition. This system gave the state complete control over the media; merged state, government, and party functions; and required military personnel, police, judges and civil servants to become party members.
On August 15, 1975, Mujib and all other members of his family, except Hasina and her younger sister, Sheikh Rehana, were assassinated during a military coup at his residence on the Dhanmondi 32 road in Dhaka.
At the time, Hasina and her sister, Rehana, were in Germany. They took refuge in India and stayed there until Hasina’s return to Bangladesh in May 1981. Upon her return, she announced the conversion of the residence to a museum as a memorial of the country’s freedom on June 10, 1981. The museum was inaugurated on August 14, 1994, by which time, Bangladesh had a democratically-elected government after a series of four military or military-backed governments until 1990.
Hasina’s Awami League eventually came to power, defeating the incumbent Bangladesh Nationalist Party government of Begum Khaleda Zia.
The house held great significance within Bangladesh’s independence movement, and many global leaders met with Rahman in this house until his assassination.
What triggered the recent attacks?
Protesters view Rahman’s house and other Awami League member properties as symbols of what they describe as years of authoritarian rule, corruption and suppression of opposition voices.
A campaign on social media to demolish the Dhanmondi 32 house had been mounting since Hasina was ousted from power last year.
On Tuesday, after BBC Bangla reported that the deposed prime minister would deliver an address in a virtual event on Wednesday night, leaders of the Students Against Discrimination movement, a group at the forefront of the campaign against Hasina last year, accused India of “waging war” against the people of Bangladesh.
At 6:30pm local time (12:30 GMT) on Wednesday, the student group’s leader, Hasnat Abdullah, wrote on Facebook: “Tonight, Bangladesh will be freed from the shrine of fascism.”
In response, police heightened security in the Dhanmondi 32 area.
What happened to Hasina’s family’s house?
By early evening on Wednesday, protesters had gathered in front of the police barricade at the Dhanmondi 32 intersection in Dhaka. A group of army soldiers briefly joined the police to maintain security but withdrew following a brief altercation with the protesters.
During Sheikh Hasina’s live speech on the Awami League’s official Facebook page and on X, she accused the interim government of unlawfully seizing power and called for resistance.
Protesters, many affiliated with the Students Against Discrimination movement, reacted with fury, with protesters carrying sticks, hammers and other tools and storming the house before setting it alight. Others brought a crane and excavator to demolish the building.
As soon as the excavator began demolishing, thousands of protesters erupted in cheers. They were also chanting slogans: “Smash the fascist stronghold, tear it down! Delhi or Dhaka? Dhaka, Dhaka! In Abu Sayeed’s Bengal, there’s no place for Hindutva.”
Abu Sayeed was an anti-Hasina protester killed in the security crackdown last July. Hindutva is the Hindu majoritarian ideology of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party.
“This house is a symbol of fascism, and the fascist Hasina is trying to destabilise our country from exile. We will not leave any trace of fascism intact,” Sayed Ahmed, one of the protesters, told Al Jazeera.
There was a mixed reaction from onlookers.
“No doubt Hasina is guilty; people have suffered because of her. But this house holds historical significance. I don’t think this is the right move,” Iqbal, a businessman who had travelled by motorbike from the old part of the city with a friend, told Al Jazeera.
His friend, however, said he saw the move as “quite OK”.
Some people were seen taking bricks from the building as tokens, while others rushed in to collect books, furniture, iron, broken grills, wood and anything else they could find.
Asked by reporters on Thursday what steps police had taken to prevent the attack on Rahman’s home, Dhaka Metropolitan Police Commissioner Sheikh Md Sazzat Ali said: “We tried. I was there myself late into the night.”
Yet, so far, no one has been arrested.
Which other buildings were targeted?
Similar incidents have taken place in at least 19 other cities across the country since Wednesday night, according to a report by the Prothom Alo newspaper.
Those include the demolition of the Awami League offices in the eastern district of Cumilla and the central district of Tangail, the residences of several key exiled leaders in Khulna, Noakhali and Kushtia districts, and the destruction of murals of Rahman in various public establishments in Sylhet and Rangpur.
No casualties have been reported as a result of these incidents so far.
Awami League leaders told Prothom Alo that two party members – one of them a woman – had also been assaulted, but Al Jazeera could not independently verify these claims.
How have the government and political figures responded?
In a statement to the media, the interim government called the vandalism at the house “regrettable” but attributed it to “public outrage” over Hasina’s speech from India about the July uprising.
It accused Hasina of insulting the uprising’s “martyrs” and inciting instability.
“Her words have reopened the wounds of the July massacre, leading to the backlash” at Dhanmondi 32, read a statement issued on Thursday afternoon by the office of the interim leader, Yunus.
“The government urges India not to allow its territory to be used for destabilising Bangladesh,” it said.
“Law enforcement is taking all necessary steps to restore order,” it said, adding: “Legal actions will also be considered against those engaging in incitement.”
Stating that the prosecution of those responsible for the July killings is progressing, the government reaffirmed its commitment to ensuring justice for the July killings.
Shafiqur Rahman, the leader of the Bangladesh Jamaat-e-Islami party, which opposed Bangladesh’s independence from Pakistan, said in a Facebook post that he held Sheikh Hasina responsible for the situation for her “incitement” through her speech.
Meanwhile, Hafiz Uddin Ahmed, a senior leader of the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, arguably the country’s most powerful political party at the moment, said in an event on Thursday: “We believe that some people may have created this chaos to obstruct the path of democracy in the coming days. In particular, we must investigate whether our neighbouring country [India] has any involvement in it.”
What does this mean for the future of the Awami League?
Once Bangladesh’s most powerful political force, the Awami League now faces widespread hostility.
Analysts said the vandalism of Rahman’s residence signals a strong rejection of the party’s legacy by sections of the population, particularly by the students and young people who largely led last year’s mass protests.
Rezaul Karim Rony, analyst and editor of Joban magazine, told Al Jazeera: “The house was supposed to be completely destroyed immediately after the fall of the [Awami League] regime on August 5, but it remained mostly intact despite partial vandalism. Now, as Sheikh Hasina denies the uprising and shows no remorse for the genocide while inciting her supporters, the people have reacted by finishing what was left.”
He added: “Many of us are critical of this step. But they should understand that fascism in Bangladesh began with Sheikh Mujibur Rahman and reached its peak under Hasina. The Awami League’s tribal, muscle-based politics will no longer prevail, as demonstrated by the July uprising.”
Rony said he could see no future for the Awami League. “After their tarnished legacy, even leadership change won’t make the Awami League relevant.”